“Sunday Morning” senior contributor Ted Koppel reflects on how the U.S. government, and the media, reacted to the 1979 kidnapping of Americans in Tehran, whose 444-day ordeal had unpredictable repercussions.
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – The governor’s approval of the final bills from this year’s legislative session has cleared the way for a revamped Albuquerque program aimed at accelerating development across the city. Vacant lots remain a common sight throughout Albuquerque, but city officials hope a new tax incentive will encourage developers to build on them. […]
Riley Green sustained an injury to the neck and ear after a concertgoer threw a phone at his face during a show in Melbourne, Australia.
Right after the hit, Green worked to help security remove the person who threw the object. But he kept the show going, even though he was visibly bleeding. He even cracked some jokes about the incident later in his set.
Watch Riley Green Get Hit With a Phone Onstage
Green was in the middle of his show when someone toward the front of the stage lobbed a cell phone at him, and it was a direct hit.
Fan-filmed video of the moment, slowed down, shows the phone connecting with the right part of the singer’s jaw, neck and ear before it bounces to the ground.
Green immediately removed his guitar and moved toward the front of the stage, pointing toward where the flying phone came from.
But he didn’t lose his temper: Instead, he calmly pointed out the man and asked security to escort him out as the crowd booed the phone-thrower and cheered for Green.
Another fan-filmed clip shows the offender being marched out of the venue by security. It looks like a couple other fans in the crowd threw some bottles at the man’s head as he was on his way out.
What Did Riley Green Say After He Got Hit With a Phone Onstage?
After security resolved the incident, Green used the break from music to turn to the rest of the audience and thank them for coming to the show.
Then, a member of his team came out with a rag to wipe away the blood trickling down the singer’s neck. Green didn’t appear to have realized until then that the phone had broken skin.
“Damn, am I bleeding? Y’all see how tough I am?” he joked, cracking a smile.
And from there, basically, it was back to the music. He continued to occasionally crack jokes about the phone-thrower during his set. When Green’s opening acts joined him onstage at the end of the show for a cover of “Dixieland Delight,” Jake Worthington appeared onstage in a hard hat.
What Did Riley Green Say About His Injury After the Show?
Green nodded to the moment in an Instagram recap posted after the show, including the hashtag “#justtextmenexttime.”
Those photos include shots of Green’s bloodied ear, both onstage and backstage after the event.
Riley Green, Instagram Stories
Riley Green, Instagram Stories
He also shared a snapshot of medics tending to him on his Instagram Stories, joking “Gettin my ear pierced.”
What Other Country Stars Have Gotten Hit By Fans Throwing Objects at Shows?
Multiple country stars have dealt with fans throwing objects onstage during their concerts. This often happens when a fan wants to give the item to the singer, or hopes the singer will sign the object and throw it back.
But sometimes — as was likely the case with Green’s recent incident — the intention isn’t so nice.
The show where Green was hit by a phone was the second of two sold-out nights in Melbourne that the singer played as part of the international leg of his Cowboy As It Gets Tour.
He’ll continue his run in Australia with stops in Sydney and Ipswich, Queensland.
See the Most Played Country Song from the Year You Were Born
Who had the most played country song during the year you were born? This list is a fascinating time capsule of prevalent trends from every decade in American history. Scroll through to find your birth year and then click to listen. Some of these songs have been lost through the years, many of them for good reason!
Only one round remains in the PGA Tour’s flagship event as Ludvig Åberg aims to convert his leads at the 36- and 54-hole leads into the largest victory of his young career at The Players Championship. Sleeping on the lead for the second consecutive night, the Swedish superstar will have to wait until 1:40 p.m. ET to get his final round underway on Sunday alongside Michael Thorbjornsen.
Before that twosome gets going at TPC Sawgrass, several fun pairings will navigate the par-72 course and give clues for what the leaders should expect. Rickie Fowler and Jordan Spieth share a final-round tee time, as they did in Rounds 1 and 2. The two fan favorites start at 8:25 a.m. and will be trailed 10 minutes later by Cognizant Classic winner Nico Echavarria and defending champion Rory McIlroy.
Three hours later, world No. 1 and two-time tournament champion Scottie Scheffler starts his final round at 11:35 a.m. alongside first-round leader Maverick McNealy. The immediate chasing starts at 1 p.m. with Xander Schauffele hoping to rebound from his third-round 74 with Robert MacIntyre, who fired the lowest round of the day on Saturday. The action will not relent Sunday, so be sure to follow 2026 Players Championship leaderboard live updates and coverage throughout Round 4.
ROME — Pope Leo XIV demanded a ceasefire in the Middle East on Sunday in his strongest comments to date, directly addressing the leaders who launched the war in Iran.
“On behalf of the Christians of the Middle East and all women and men of good will, I appeal to those responsible for this conflict,” Leo said. “Cease fire so that avenues for dialogue may be reopened. Violence can never lead to the justice, stability, and peace that the people are waiting for.”
Leo didn’t cite the United States or Israel by name in his comments at the end of his Sunday noon blessing. But history’s first U.S. pope mentioned the attacks that targeted a school, an apparent reference to the missile strike on an elementary school in Iran in the opening days of the war that killed over 165 people, many of them children.
U.S. officials have said outdated intelligence likely led to the United States launching the strike, and that an investigation is ongoing.
The Vatican has highlighted the carnage of the Minab strike, running an aerial photo of the mass grave being dug for the young victims on the March 6 front page of its official newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, under the headline “The Face of War.”
Leo said he was close to the families of those who had been killed in the attacks “which have hit schools, hospitals and residential centers.” He expressed particular concern about the impact of the war in Lebanon, where aid groups are warning of a humanitarian crisis.
The plight of Christian communities in southern Lebanon is of particular concern to the Vatican, since they have long represented a bulwark for Christians throughout the majority Muslim region.
For the two weeks since the start of the U.S.-Israeli war, the pope has limited his comments to muted appeals for diplomacy and dialogue in an apparent attempt to avoid pitting himself as an American political counterweight to President Donald Trump. He hasn’t named the U.S. or Israel publicly, but that is also in keeping with the Vatican’s tradition of diplomatic neutrality.
On Friday, for example, in a speech to priests attending a Vatican class on the sacrament of confession, Leo said the sacrament was a workshop that restores unity and peace.
“One might well ask: do those Christians who bear grave responsibility in armed conflicts have the humility and courage to make a serious examination of conscience and to go to confession?” he said.
But while Leo has sought to keep his messaging indirect and apolitical to avoid inflaming tensions, some of his U.S. cardinals and the Vatican secretary of state have not.
Cardinal Robert McElroy, the archbishop of Washington, said the war was morally unjustifiable. Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich said it was “sickening” how the White House was splicing video game imagery into its social media messaging about the war.
The Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, rejected Washington’s claim of a “preventive war.” But he said this week that the Holy See was regardless keeping dialogue open.
“The Holy See speaks with everyone, and when necessary we speak also with the Americans, with the Israelis and show them what to us are the solutions,” he said.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
The Trump administration likes to promote its immigration enforcement agenda through numbers, with ambitious goals to deport 1 million people, report zero releases at the U.S.-Mexico border and arrest thousands of alleged gang members.Related video above: Federal judge: teen detained by immigration agents must be returned to Mass.For all the boasting, the administration has been releasing less reliable, carefully vetted data than its predecessors on a signature policy stance that has become one of the most contentious of Trump’s second term.The gap in information and a loss of figures from an office that has tracked immigration data back to the 1800s have left researchers, advocates, lawyers and journalists without important statistics to hold the Republican administration to account.”They aren’t publishing the data,” said Mike Howell, who heads the conservative Oversight Project, an advocacy group pushing for more deportations. Instead, Howell said, the Department of Homeland Security has put out numbers in news releases “that purport to be statistics with no statistical backup and the numbers have jumped all over the place.”With mass deportations a priority, new restrictions and increased enforcement have led to a surge in immigration arrests, detentions and deportations.But finding the metrics that once measured those changes can be hard. It is an extension of earlier administration moves to limit the flow of government information by scrubbing or removing federal datasets or by the firing last year of the top official overseeing jobs data. The Office of Homeland Security Statistics is responsible for publishing figures from Homeland Security agencies, including removals and the nationalities of those deported, to provide a comprehensive picture of immigration trends at the border and inside the United States.Originally known as the Office of Immigration Statistics, it tracked such data beginning in 1872. In its current form, created under the Biden administration, it also started publishing monthly reports that allowed researchers to track developments almost in real time. But key enforcement metrics on its website have not been updated since early last year. A note on the page where the monthly reports were says it “is delayed while it is under review.””It’s the most timely data. It’s the most reliable data,” Austin Kocher, research professor at Syracuse University who closely follows immigration data trends, said about the monthly reports. “It has the most omniscient view of immigration enforcement across the entire agency.”An interactive dashboard launched by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in December 2023 once let users examine whom the agency was arresting, their nationalities, criminal histories and removal numbers. ICE called it a “new era in transparency.” Though intended for quarterly updates, the latest data is from January 2025. The agency’s annual report, typically released in December, had not been published as of mid-March.Other agencies also publish data that touches on immigration, and parts of it do continue to roll out, such as U.S. Customs and Border Protection statistics detailing border encounters or data from the Department of Justice’s immigration courts. But experts say other data has slowed. The State Department’s most recent visa issuance data is from August. Key statistics from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services have not been updated since October.The now-missing data had helped researchers study the effects of different policies. Lawyers could cite the figures to support their litigation. Journalists saw in them a powerful tool to hold the government to account on public claims or to report on important trends. “We’re all a little bit in the dark about exactly how immigration enforcement is operating at a time when it’s taking new and unprecedented forms,” said Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute.DHS did not respond to detailed questions about why it was no longer releasing specific data. “This is the most transparent Administration in history, we release new data multiple times a week and upon reporter request,” the department said in a statement. Figures the administration has released are inconsistent and unverifiable.In a Jan. 20 news release, DHS said it had deported more than 675,000 people since Trump returned to the White House. A day later, in a second release, the department put the figure at 622,000. In congressional testimony March 4, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the figure was 700,000.But ICE, an agency within DHS, also releases figures on how many people it has removed from the country, part of a large data release mandated by Congress. An Associated Press analysis of the figures put that number at roughly 400,000 over Trump’s first year.DHS has said 2.2 million people who were in the U.S. illegally have gone home on their own, but the department has given no explanation for the count. Experts have questioned the source of that figure, saying this was not something that DHS historically has tracked.The department did not respond to questions about where that data came from.With key sources of data halted, researchers, advocates and others have had to rely on information the administration is obliged to report or that has come to light through legal action.The publication of ICE detention figures — how many people are detained, for how long and whether they have committed a crime — is required by Congress and is generally released every two weeks. But the figures’ release has faced some delays, and its data gets overwritten with every new publication, complicating the work of people who need access to it. The University of California, Berkeley’s Deportation Data Project, a research initiative, successfully sued through the Freedom of Information Act to access data about ICE arrests, including nationalities, conviction status and whether arrests occurred at jails or in the community.Graeme Blair, co-director of the project, said every administration has struggled with transparency in immigration enforcement, and given the Trump administration’s ambitious enforcement goals, the team wanted to secure and verify information that the government might not publicly release.”Given the scale of what they were talking about doing, it seemed really important to be able to understand, to be able to double check those numbers,” he said.But there are limitations, he said. The data obtained through the lawsuit only runs through Oct. 15. It does not cover recent operations such as the Minneapolis enforcement surge, when federal immigration officers fatally shot two protesters, leading to widespread demonstrations and scrutiny of enforcement tactics.The absence of data is one of the few issues that has drawn bipartisan criticism. “We deserve to know the numbers, just like we deserve to know who’s in our country and who needs to leave,” Howell said.
WASHINGTON —
The Trump administration likes to promote its immigration enforcement agenda through numbers, with ambitious goals to deport 1 million people, report zero releases at the U.S.-Mexico border and arrest thousands of alleged gang members.
Related video above: Federal judge: teen detained by immigration agents must be returned to Mass.
For all the boasting, the administration has been releasing less reliable, carefully vetted data than its predecessors on a signature policy stance that has become one of the most contentious of Trump’s second term.
The gap in information and a loss of figures from an office that has tracked immigration data back to the 1800s have left researchers, advocates, lawyers and journalists without important statistics to hold the Republican administration to account.
“They aren’t publishing the data,” said Mike Howell, who heads the conservative Oversight Project, an advocacy group pushing for more deportations. Instead, Howell said, the Department of Homeland Security has put out numbers in news releases “that purport to be statistics with no statistical backup and the numbers have jumped all over the place.”
With mass deportations a priority, new restrictions and increased enforcement have led to a surge in immigration arrests, detentions and deportations.
But finding the metrics that once measured those changes can be hard. It is an extension of earlier administration moves to limit the flow of government information by scrubbing or removing federal datasets or by the firing last year of the top official overseeing jobs data.
The Office of Homeland Security Statistics is responsible for publishing figures from Homeland Security agencies, including removals and the nationalities of those deported, to provide a comprehensive picture of immigration trends at the border and inside the United States.
Originally known as the Office of Immigration Statistics, it tracked such data beginning in 1872. In its current form, created under the Biden administration, it also started publishing monthly reports that allowed researchers to track developments almost in real time.
But key enforcement metrics on its website have not been updated since early last year. A note on the page where the monthly reports were says it “is delayed while it is under review.”
“It’s the most timely data. It’s the most reliable data,” Austin Kocher, research professor at Syracuse University who closely follows immigration data trends, said about the monthly reports. “It has the most omniscient view of immigration enforcement across the entire agency.”
An interactive dashboard launched by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in December 2023 once let users examine whom the agency was arresting, their nationalities, criminal histories and removal numbers. ICE called it a “new era in transparency.”
Though intended for quarterly updates, the latest data is from January 2025. The agency’s annual report, typically released in December, had not been published as of mid-March.
Other agencies also publish data that touches on immigration, and parts of it do continue to roll out, such as U.S. Customs and Border Protection statistics detailing border encounters or data from the Department of Justice’s immigration courts.
But experts say other data has slowed.
The State Department’s most recent visa issuance data is from August. Key statistics from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services have not been updated since October.
The now-missing data had helped researchers study the effects of different policies. Lawyers could cite the figures to support their litigation. Journalists saw in them a powerful tool to hold the government to account on public claims or to report on important trends.
“We’re all a little bit in the dark about exactly how immigration enforcement is operating at a time when it’s taking new and unprecedented forms,” said Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute.
DHS did not respond to detailed questions about why it was no longer releasing specific data.
“This is the most transparent Administration in history, we release new data multiple times a week and upon reporter request,” the department said in a statement.
Figures the administration has released are inconsistent and unverifiable.
In a Jan. 20 news release, DHS said it had deported more than 675,000 people since Trump returned to the White House. A day later, in a second release, the department put the figure at 622,000. In congressional testimony March 4, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the figure was 700,000.
But ICE, an agency within DHS, also releases figures on how many people it has removed from the country, part of a large data release mandated by Congress. An Associated Press analysis of the figures put that number at roughly 400,000 over Trump’s first year.
DHS has said 2.2 million people who were in the U.S. illegally have gone home on their own, but the department has given no explanation for the count. Experts have questioned the source of that figure, saying this was not something that DHS historically has tracked.
The department did not respond to questions about where that data came from.
With key sources of data halted, researchers, advocates and others have had to rely on information the administration is obliged to report or that has come to light through legal action.
The publication of ICE detention figures — how many people are detained, for how long and whether they have committed a crime — is required by Congress and is generally released every two weeks. But the figures’ release has faced some delays, and its data gets overwritten with every new publication, complicating the work of people who need access to it.
The University of California, Berkeley’s Deportation Data Project, a research initiative, successfully sued through the Freedom of Information Act to access data about ICE arrests, including nationalities, conviction status and whether arrests occurred at jails or in the community.
Graeme Blair, co-director of the project, said every administration has struggled with transparency in immigration enforcement, and given the Trump administration’s ambitious enforcement goals, the team wanted to secure and verify information that the government might not publicly release.
“Given the scale of what they were talking about doing, it seemed really important to be able to understand, to be able to double check those numbers,” he said.
But there are limitations, he said. The data obtained through the lawsuit only runs through Oct. 15. It does not cover recent operations such as the Minneapolis enforcement surge, when federal immigration officers fatally shot two protesters, leading to widespread demonstrations and scrutiny of enforcement tactics.
The absence of data is one of the few issues that has drawn bipartisan criticism.
“We deserve to know the numbers, just like we deserve to know who’s in our country and who needs to leave,” Howell said.
Texas Tech star guard Christian Anderson will be available for the NCAA tournament, the school announced Saturday.
Anderson left the Red Raiders’ Big 12 tournament loss to Iowa State on Thursday early after losing his footing on the glass court. He slipped on an inbounds pass and immediately grabbed at his groin area, eventually limping to the sideline and not returning to the game.
He said afterward that he was “feeling good.”
Anderson, a 6-foot-3 guard from Atlanta, was recently named the Big 12’s most improved player and earned a spot on the league’s all-conference first team.
He averaged 18.9 points, 3.6 rebounds and 7.6 assists, ranking fourth nationally in the latter category.
Texas Tech lost All-American forward JT Toppin to a torn ACL in February, an injury that put more of the offensive load on Anderson.
The Red Raiders (22-10, 12-6 Big 12) are likely to land a 4-seed or 5-seed in the NCAA tournament when the bracket is announced Sunday.
Anderson’s injury was one of the reasons the Big 12 transitioned back to a hardwood court for the semifinals and finals of the conference tournament after using an innovative LED glass court for the first two rounds and the quarterfinals.
FBI officials say laptop farms are a crucial way North Korean IT teams trick U.S. companies into believing their remote workers are in the U.S. — providing both a physical address to mail laptops to and a U.S. internet connection. Once equipped with certain remote access software and tools, workers can log into those laptops remotely.
So far, at least 10 alleged U.S.-based facilitators have been federally charged, including one active-duty member of the U.S. Army, for their alleged roles in hosting laptop farms, laundering payments and moving proceeds through shell companies. At least six other alleged U.S. facilitators have been identified in court documents but not named.
In one instance, an American citizen, Kejia “Tony” Wang, traveled to China in 2023 to meet with co-conspirators and IT workers in Shenyang and Dandong, according to court documents. Laptops from over 100 U.S. companies, including a California-based defense contractor, were sent to Wang, who also set up shell companies to help route wages earned overseas. Wang pleaded guilty to charges related to wire fraud, money laundering and identity theft and is awaiting sentencing next month.
“We believe there are many more hundreds of people out there who are participating in these schemes,” said Rozhavsky, the FBI assistant director. “They could never pull this off if they didn’t have willing facilitators in the U.S. helping them.”
Once illicit money has been earned, it needs to be consolidated and converted to government-issued currency. North Korean teams typically rely on a maze of Chinese networks to launder it, according to industry reports.
“Every bad guy you can think of is using Chinese money launderers. Now, this is how money moves internationally,” said Nick Carlsen, senior investigator on the global investigations team at the blockchain analytics company TRM Labs and a former intelligence analyst at the FBI focused on North Korea.
Since Kim Jong Un took power in 2011, North Korea has honed and expanded a portfolio of cybercrime operations beyond IT work — pulling in billions through cryptocurrency thefts including a record $1.5 billion heist last year, according to the FBI. Analysts say these operations have made Kim wealthier and more geopolitically relevant than ever before, validating his long-held view of cyberoperations as an “all-purpose sword.”
In recent years, North Korea’s partnership with Chinese money laundering networks has unlocked a new level of speed and efficiency that North Korean operators had not been able to achieve independently.
“The transformative element is the existence of these superliquid Chinese financial networks,” Carlsen said. “They can absorb a lot of money, convert it and transfer it in whatever domestic currency you want. That’s the big change.”
North Korean IT workers in an undisclosed location.Dept. of Justice
Most of these intermediaries operate across southern China and Southeast Asia including Myanmar, Hong Kong, Macao and China’s Fujian province — rapidly moving cryptocurrency across blockchains using so-called “mixers” that break stolen funds into smaller pieces to obscure their origin. IT worker proceeds are typically smaller sums and involve fewer intermediaries, said Andrew Fierman, head of national security intelligence at the blockchain tracking company Chainalysis, while the larger crypto heist sums require complex, multilayered laundering chains.
Carlsen noted that funds from both IT worker schemes and crypto heists frequently end up with Chinese brokers tied to organized-crime syndicates. “You see overlaps with pig-butchering scams and with drug cartels,” he said. “These are the same networks absorbing this money.” Cryptocurrencies have made that convergence easier. “It’s the lubricant,” he added. “The oil that allows all these gears to interact with each other.”
The U.S. government has taken some steps to address North Korea’s IT worker scheme, but experts warn the threat is intensifying as workers’ use of AI continues to scale up around the globe.
Cybersecurity analysts say U.S. enforcement tools are struggling to keep pace with the scale and sophistication of Pyongyang’s cyberoperations. Many of the individuals involved operate from countries that lack extradition agreements with the U.S., placing them largely beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement.
“It’s a whack-a-mole game. It’s virtually impossible to fully disrupt this,” Carlsen said. “It’s just a never-ending process.”
He argues the most effective strategy is to make schemes less profitable by cutting off the regime’s ability to cash out through money laundering organizations.
The U.S. government has ramped up efforts to do that. On Thursday, the Treasury Department sanctioned six individuals and two entities for their roles in DPRK government-orchestrated IT worker schemes, including facilitators based in North Korea, Vietnam, Laos and Spain.
Last fall, federal authorities announced a wave of criminal indictments, forfeitures, sanctions and asset freezes targeting North Korea’s illicit cyber activity.
In October, the Treasury Department severed Cambodia-based Huione Group, a financial-guarantee network, from the U.S. financial system, alleging it laundered billions in illicit proceeds, including at least $37 million in cryptocurrency linked to North Korean operations. Weeks later, eight individuals and two entities, including North Korean bankers and institutions, were sanctioned for laundering funds derived from cybercrime and IT worker fraud schemes.
North Korea, for its part, has denied any wrongdoing.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un participates in a photo session with soldiers in North Pyongan province on Feb. 1.Korean Central News Agency via Getty Image
Last year, following the Department of Justice’s indictment of several North Koreans for their alleged roles in the scheme, the country’s foreign minister condemned U.S. actions as “an absurd smear campaign” targeting the “non-existent ‘cyber threat’ from the DPRK,” the Korean Central News Agency reported.
In response to questions about Chinese nationals’ involvement in the scheme, Chinese Embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu said, “We oppose false allegations and smears which have no factual ground at all.”
The scheme itself is also becoming more complex. North Korean IT teams are now subcontracting work to developers in Pakistan, Nigeria and India, expanding into fields like customer service, financial processing, insurance and translation services — roles far less scrutinized than software development.
“Unless you have external information, you might not know they’re North Korean,” said Michael Barnhart, who leads nation-state threat intelligence at DTEX. “They’re trying to move themselves into middle management, and it’s working.”
That expansion also means concerns that North Korean workers could cause real-world harm by jeopardizing lives, something Barnhart has seen up close.
In 2021, as part of a wave of attacks on NASA and military bases, a North Korean hacking team infected a Kansas hospital’s computer systems with ransomware, crippling servers and demanding roughly $100,000 in bitcoin to restore their function. The hospital paid. Barnhart helped investigate the hack alongside the FBI, and it was that case that made clear to him the ways in which North Korea’s malicious hacking teams sometimes cooperate with IT teams to support their missions, something that was not widely known at the time.
What he saw was a hacking operator engaged in IT work, including placing other IT workers in jobs. The income from those jobs supported the hacking unit’s primary malware operations to commit computer intrusions against U.S., South Korean and Chinese government or technology victims.
“It started off as revenue generation, but the lines are getting blurrier and blurrier. If the time comes, they’ve got chess pieces inside organizations all over the world — and they’ll start acting from the inside,” he said.
Rozhavsky expressed similar concerns.
“Even if a company gets rid of them, we don’t know what backdoors they could have left for access in the future,” he said. “So it’s definitely a ticking time bomb that could have negative consequences down the line.”
Lawmakers are also seeking stronger defenses. Sens. Gary Peters, D-Mich., and Mike Rounds, R-S.D., introduced the Protecting America from Cyber Threats Act, which would renew key cybersecurity authorities for another decade and encourage private companies, like Nisos, to share information about cyberthreats with the federal government.
Still, thousands of workers, the driving force of the IT schemes, remain out of reach, the majority of whom are based in China.
“These are the smartest people in North Korea. That’s kind of the tragedy of it,” Carlsen said. “They’ve taken their best and brightest and made them criminals.”
The third-seeded Arkansas Razorbacks take on the fourth-seeded Vanderbilt Commodores for the 2026 SEC Tournament championship on Sunday. Vanderbilt stunned top-seeded Florida 91-74 in the semifinals on Saturday, while Arkansas outlasted 15th-seeded Ole Miss 93-90 in overtime in the other one. The Commodores (26-7), who have won four in a row, are looking to win their third SEC Tournament championship and first since 2012. The Razorbacks (25-8), who have won four straight, are looking for their second SEC Tournament title and first since 2000.
Tipoff from Bridgestone Arena in Nashville, Tenn., is set for 1 p.m. ET. Arkansas leads the all-time series 32-15, including a 93-68 win on Jan. 20. Vanderbilt is a 2.5-point favorite in the latest Vanderbilt vs. Arkansas odds from DraftKings Sportsbook, while the over/under for total points scored is 166.5. Before making any Arkansas vs. Vanderbilt picks, check out the men’s college basketball predictions and betting advice from the SportsLine Projection Model.
The SportsLine Projection Model simulates every college basketball game 10,000 times. It entered conference tournament week on a sizzling 14-2 run on its top-rated over/under college basketball picks dating back to last season, and is on a 28-21 run on top-rated CBB side picks. Anyone following its college basketball betting advice at sportsbooks and on betting apps could have seen strong returns.
SportsLine’s model is going Over on the total (166.5 points). The Over has hit in seven of the last eight meetings between the teams. The Over has also hit in five of the last six Vanderbilt games, and in seven of the last eight Arkansas games. The Commodores are 3-0 against the spread in their last three games, while the Razorbacks are 6-4 ATS in their last 10.
The model projects Vanderbilt to have six players score 10.2 points or more, including Tyler Tanner and Duke Miles, who are both projected to score 18 points. Arkansas is projected to have four players score 10.2 points or more, led by Darius Acuff Jr., who is projected to score 21.3 points. The model is projecting 169 combined points.