Home Blog Page 199

Trump’s China trip thrown into doubt by Iran war, but Beijing doesn’t seem to mind waiting

0


BEIJING — The timing of a highly anticipated summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping is in doubt after Trump asked to delay it by “a month or so” so he can focus on the widening war with Iran.

It’s the latest complication from the U.S.-Israeli attack on Tehran, which has close ties with Beijing, as the conflict adds another possible point of tension between America and China.

The summit was meant to focus on trade, as both Trump and Xi seek to extend a delicate tariff truce between the world’s two biggest economies. But China showed little immediate sign that it was bothered by the likely delay, which analysts told NBC News may actually prove beneficial to efforts to further stabilize relations.

President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping
President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Busan, South Korea, in October.Andrew Caballero-Reynolds / AFP via Getty Images file

Trump said Monday that his China trip planned for later this month could be postponed because of the war, telling reporters in Washington, “I think it’s important that I be here.” But his administration has not confirmed that the trip is delayed or shared more specific dates for when it would be rescheduled.

Beijing did little to clarify the situation Tuesday, with the Chinese Foreign Ministry saying it had “no further information at this time.”

“China and the United States are maintaining communication regarding the timing of President Trump’s visit to China and other related issues,” spokesperson Lin Jian told reporters at a regular news briefing in Beijing, repeating a line from the day before.

The White House had said Trump would be traveling from March 31 to April 2. China had not yet confirmed the dates.

A cargo ship loaded with foreign trade containers sails on the water next to smaller boats
A cargo ship sailing into Qingdao Port in Shandong province, China, on March 3.Costfoto / NurPhoto via Getty Images

With global shipping and energy prices upended by Iran’s effective shutdown of the crucial Strait of Hormuz, Trump has been trying to enlist naval support from countries that import oil and gas through the waterway. On Sunday, he told The Financial Times that he would “like to know” whether China was going to help and suggested that he might delay the trip.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent sought to clarify that postponing the trip “would have nothing to do with the Chinese making a commitment to the Strait of Hormuz.” Trump later said there were “no tricks to it” and that he looked forward to the trip.

China also says the visit has nothing to do with the strait and has been outwardly unruffled by the uncertainty around Trump’s plans.

Far from being upset by a possible delay, China “might actually be a little relieved,” said Dominic Chiu, a senior analyst for U.S.-China relations at Eurasia Group.

“From what I understand, preparations for the Trump state visit have been going pretty poorly,” he told NBC News in an interview.

Image: U.S. And Israel Wage War Against Iran
A woman being helped from the scene of a strike on a residential building in Tehran on Monday.Getty Images

Even before the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran began Feb. 28, there was reportedly “a lack of coordination on the side of the White House to come up with concrete deliverables, to gather a potential business delegation to accompany Trump to China,” Chiu said.

If the summit is delayed, “that gives both sides a bit more time to talk,” he said.

Other analysts agreed.

“Right now the Iran war is clearly the Trump administration’s top foreign policy priority, so I doubt Beijing will interpret an American delay as an intentional negotiation tactic,” said Austin Strange, an associate professor of politics at the University of Hong Kong.

“In principle China would still like a more stable and positive relationship with the U.S. and should be willing to reschedule a Trump visit to China, particularly compared to the much less realistic request for Beijing to contribute to escorts of commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz,” Strange said in emailed comments.

Though the latest round of U.S.-China trade talks appeared to go well, it ended Monday in Paris without any public announcements. Expectations for the Trump-Xi summit, which comes after years of turbulence in U.S.-China relations, have generally been low.

“I think a grand bargain is increasingly unlikely,” Chiu said.

Instead, he said, the U.S. and China will focus on the “lowest-hanging fruits” they can offer each other, such as Chinese pledges to buy more U.S. agricultural and energy products, or to further crack down on the international flow of fentanyl ingredients.

With many of Trump’s global tariffs recently struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, Beijing also sees the summit as an opportunity to negotiate lower rates, Chiu said.

Though Beijing has publicly criticized new Section 301 trade investigations the Trump administration has opened against China and other countries as it tries to replace those tariffs, it appears to consider them a “manageable irritant,” he said.

Luojiashan tanker sits anchored in Muscat, as Iran vows to close the Strait of Hormuz, in Muscat
Tankers sitting anchored in Muscat, Oman, near the Strait of Hormuz on March 7.Benoit Tessier / Reuters

And while China is concerned about the supply of oil and gas through the Strait of Hormuz, “I don’t think they are exactly wringing their hands over it,” Chiu said.

Though Trump said Monday that China — the world’s largest energy importer — gets over 90% of its oil through the strait, experts put the figure closer to half. China is also a major producer of oil and gas in its own right and has been building up its strategic oil reserves.

Some of its oil is also still getting through the strait, said Tim Huxley, director of Mandarin Shipping in Hong Kong. But even if its energy supply is relatively secure, China would still prefer an end to the blockade.

“China has got enough for the next few months,” Huxley said. “But the longer this goes on, the more difficult it is.”

Janis Mackey Frayer reported from Beijing, and Jennifer Jett from Hong Kong.



Source link

Tax increase fails, United stadium placement, Heating up, Missing general update, Pedestrian and cycling safety

0




Tuesday’s Top Stories Tuesday’s Five Facts [1] Albuquerque City Council votes down proposed gross receipts tax increase – Councilor Brook Bassan and Councilor Joaquín Baca proposed a 0.4875% sales tax increase, which they say equals less than half a penny for every dollar spent and would generate approximately $140 million over the course of a […]



Source link

Amazon Launches 1-Hour Delivery in Hundreds of U.S. Cities

0




The e-commerce firm is also rolling out 3-hour delivery for a fee as it fends off a growing threat from Walmart.



Source link

UMBC vs. Howard prediction, odds, spread, time: 2026 First Four picks from proven model

0



The UMBC Retrievers battle the Howard Bison in a 2026 First Four matchup on Tuesday night. The winner will be the 16th seed and will face the top-seeded Michigan Wolverines on Thursday in the first round. UMBC won the American East title over the University of Vermont by a score of 74-59, while Howard won the MEAC tournament 70-63 over the North Carolina Central Eagles. The Retrievers (24 – 8), who finished in first place in the American East, have won twelve straight games. The Bison (23-10), who finished in first place in the MEAC, have won eight straight games. 

Tipoff from UD Arena in Dayton, Ohio, is set for 6:40 p.m. ET. Howards has the all-time series lead, 5-2. The Retrievers and Bison met last season, with the Retrievers winning 95-77. UMBC is a 1.5-point favorite in the latest UMBC vs Howard odds from DraftKings Sportsbook, while the over/under for total points scored is 140.5. Before making any Howard vs. UMBC picks, check out the men’s college basketball predictions and betting advice from the SportsLine Projection Model.

The SportsLine Projection Model simulates every college basketball game 10,000 times. It entered the tournament on a sizzling 11-1 run on its top-rated over/under college basketball picks dating back to last season, and is on a 28-22 run on top-rated CBB side picks. Anyone following its advice at sportsbooks and on betting apps could have seen strong returns.

Now, the model has simulated UMBC vs. Howard 10,000 times and just revealed its First Four picks and betting predictions. You can head to SportsLine now to see the model’s picks. Here are several men’s college basketball odds and men’s college basketball betting lines for Howard vs. UMBC:

UMBC vs. Howard spread:    

UMBC -1.5

UMBC vs. Howard over/under:    

140.5 points

UMBC vs. Howard money line:    

UMBC -121, Howard +101

UMBC vs. Howard picks:    

See picks at SportsLine

UMBC vs. Howard TV:

truTV

Top UMBC vs. Howard predictions

After 10,000 simulations of UMBC vs. Howard, SportsLine’s model is going Over on the total (140.5 points). The Over hit in the last meeting between the teams. UMBC is 6-0 against the spread in its last six games and 10-0 straight up in its last 10 games. 

The model projects the Retrievers to have four players score 10.3 points or more, including Jah’Likai King, who is projected to score 14.3 points. The Bison are projected to have four players score 10.3 points or more, led by Bryce Harris, who is projected to score 19.3 points. The model is projecting 151 combined points as the Over clears in over 80% of simulations. 

How to make UMBC vs. Howard picks

The model also says one side of the spread hits more than 60% of the time. You can only see that pick at SportsLine.

So who wins UMBC vs. Howard, and which side of the spread hits in more than 60% of simulations? Visit SportsLine now to see which side of the spread to back, all from the advanced model that has simulated this game 10,000 times, and find out.





Source link

Israel kills 2 senior Iran leaders as allies reject Trump’s call for Strait of Hormuz help

0


The Israel Defense Forces said in a statement Tuesday that the commander of Iran’s feared Basij paramilitary force was among the senior leaders killed in overnight strikes in Tehran, and the Israeli defense minister Israel Katz later confirmed that Ali Larijani, the head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, was also “eliminated.”

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and I have instructed the IDF to continue pursuing the leadership of the terror and oppression regime in Iran,” Katz said in a statement, adding that Israel would update President Trump on the killing of the two senior Iranian figures “when morning breaks in Washington.”

“The Israeli Air Force, acting on IDF intelligence, targeted and eliminated Gholamreza Soleimani, who operated as commander of the Basij unit for the past six years,” the IDF said in an earlier statement, accusing the Basij, under Soleimani’s command, of leading “the main repression operations, employing severe violence, widespread arrests, and the use of force against civilian demonstrators” to quash anti-government protests that swept across Iran in January.

The IDF called Soleimani’s assassination “an additional significant blow to the regime’s security command-and-control structures” and it vowed to “continue to operate with determination against commanders of the Iranian terror regime.”

Until Monday, Larijani was among the most senior leaders of the regime still alive in Iran. He had been a defiant voice since the war began and he warned only a week ago, in a message aimed at Mr. Trump, that the Iranian people “do not fear your empty threats; even those greater than you have failed to erase them… so beware lest you be the ones who disappear.”

Netanyahu’s office, meanwhile, posted a photo on social media of the Israeli leader on the phone, with a message saying only: “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu orders the elimination of senior Iranian regime officials.” 





Source link

Lincoln National Forest ups fire danger rating to ‘high’

0



With record-high temperatures forecast for New Mexico this week, Lincoln National Forest on Monday increased its fire danger rating from “moderate” to “high” for all three of its ranger districts. The color-coded rating system for “high,” or red, means:– Dry grasses, leaves, and small branches can catch fire easily;– Most sparks or heat sources can start a fire; — Unattended campfires or brush fires are likely to escape;– Fires spread quickly, especially on slopes or in areas of dry vegetation; — Small fires can become dangerous if not put out right away. There are no restrictions on campfires in Lincoln National Forest, but it’s important that visitors are aware of the risks and take proper precautions. They should never leave a campfire unattended, drown the fire with plenty of water, stir the ashes, and add more water until everything is cold to the touch, and avoid burning on windy days.More information is available online at fs.usda.gov/r03/lincoln?utm_source=MarketingCloud&utm_medium=email

With record-high temperatures forecast for New Mexico this week, Lincoln National Forest on Monday increased its fire danger rating from “moderate” to “high” for all three of its ranger districts.

The color-coded rating system for “high,” or red, means:

— Dry grasses, leaves, and small branches can catch fire easily;

— Most sparks or heat sources can start a fire;

— Unattended campfires or brush fires are likely to escape;

— Fires spread quickly, especially on slopes or in areas of dry vegetation;

— Small fires can become dangerous if not put out right away.

There are no restrictions on campfires in Lincoln National Forest, but it’s important that visitors are aware of the risks and take proper precautions. They should never leave a campfire unattended, drown the fire with plenty of water, stir the ashes, and add more water until everything is cold to the touch, and avoid burning on windy days.

More information is available online at

fs.usda.gov/r03/lincoln?utm_source=MarketingCloud&utm_medium=email



Source link

Brantley Gilbert Doubles Down on TPUSA Halftime Show Performance

0


Brantley Gilbert isn’t backing down from his decision to perform during Turning Point USA’s All-American Halftime Show.

More than a month after the politically charged event sparked debate online, the country singer is opening up about why he agreed to do it — and making it clear he has no regrets.

Gilbert told Us Weekly the opportunity was never about politics or stirring division.

Brantley Gilbert’s Halftime Show Decision

“It was a weird place for me. Hate is not my thing,” Gilbert said, addressing the backlash, while promoting his role as an investor and equity partner in Real American Beer.

Read More: Kid Rock Claps Back After Conan O’Brien Mocks TP Halftime Show at the Oscars

“I’m a husband and a dad, and protecting my kids is something I’m concerned with always,” he told the outlet. “But this wasn’t something I’ve felt like I need to protect anybody from.”

Gilbert said the event was pitched to him as a patriotic opportunity — something that immediately appealed to him.

“This was something that was pitched to us as a patriotic event,” he explained. “I didn’t know if the other show was going to give a shout-out to veterans or active duty guys and girls, but I know if we played this one, we’d have the opportunity to do that.”

Read More: Turning Point USA’s ‘All-American Halftime Show’ Is Planning Its Next Move — Here’s What’s Coming

During the halftime show, Gilbert performed a patriotic song along with two of his own hits. He said one of the most meaningful parts of the experience was simply having his family there.

“As a dad, I thought it was cool that my kids got to watch a couple quarters of football and then watch their dad play some songs,” he said.

No Apology Coming

Gilbert joined Kid Rock, Gabby Barrett and Lee Brice for the Turning Point USA All-American Halftime Show, which streamed online during Super Bowl weekend.

The event drew attention both for its lineup and its political ties. But Gilbert says his focus was on using his platform to highlight members of the military.

It gave me an opportunity to further share my spotlight and my platform with people that deserve it,” he said. “Those are the men and women that have selflessly served our country and endured sacrifices and losses that we’ll never understand.”

Taste of Country logo

And if critics are waiting for him to walk back the decision, he says they shouldn’t hold their breath.

If somebody’s waiting on me to be apologetic for that,” Gilbert said, “they’re going to be waiting a while.”

The singer has long built his career around hard-edged country anthems like “Country Must Be Country Wide,” “Bottoms Up” and “One Hell of an Amen.”

In recent years, he’s also become increasingly open about the role his family plays in his decisions. Gilbert and his wife, Amber, married in 2015 and now share three children.

13 Most Patriotic Country Stars

Country music is closely aligned with the military and with patriotism, so it’s no surprise that many top country stars are openly patriotic. But some are even more notable than others in their avid patriotism. Scroll through to see the most patriotic stars in country music.

Gallery Credit: Sterling Whitaker





Source link

Energy & Utilities Roundup: Market Talk

0




Find insight on RH Petrogas, crude prices, Aboitiz Power and more in the latest Market Talks covering Energy and Utilities.



Source link

A back three isn’t always defensive: It might be just what your team needs

0


Week after week, month after month, Rúben Amorim sent out his Manchester United players in a 3-4-2-1 shape. Many considered it to be a mistake and, among the many gripes about Amorim’s play, the sentiment “it’s too defensive” was rife.

It is a familiar complaint with a back-three system; with three center backs as opposed to the more typical two you’d find in a back four, it’s easy to see how fans would think a team is setting up to be more defensive. But that’s not necessarily the case.

The last decade or so has been littered with examples of how a team playing a back three can be among the most attacking and aggressive in the sport — with one particularly extreme case currently on show in the Dutch Eredivisie — and even Amorim’s United debunked that theory to an extent. In the 20 Premier League games he managed this season, the Red Devils registered the most shots on target (109) and accumulated the third-most xG (36.14) in the league, behind only Arsenal (36.41) and Manchester City (38.02).

Now Amorim’s team had problems, let’s not pretend otherwise, and we’ll circle back to that a little later. But using a back three is not automatically a cue to sit back and defend, it can be a bold and innovative shape. Here’s why.

Wing backs are attacking, aggressive, and difficult to mark

A trademark feature of the back-three system is the use of wing backs, a position which occupies a unique place in football tactics. It can be difficult to classify them as defenders, midfielders, or forwards as they effectively play all three roles simultaneously in one of the most complex briefs the sport has to offer.

Very few wing backs are defensively minded. It used to be a joke in scouting circles that every full back is a failed winger who has been forced to drop deeper on the pitch, but in the age of “inverted wingers” and wide forwards who can score 40 goals a season, having a wing back who can bolster the attack is hugely beneficial, as their defensive duties are often covered by others.

Take Inter Milan’s duo of Federico Dimarco and Denzel Dumfries, for example.

Left-sided wing back Dimarco has created the most chances by far in Italy’s Serie A this season (76), has the highest Expected Assists tally (8.49) too, which signifies the quality of the opportunities he fashions, and spends more time in the final third than he does anywhere else on the pitch.

Meanwhile, on the right, Dumfries acts like a striker who has been forced to play elsewhere; he is constantly getting into the opponent’s box and offers a massive threat when he arrives at the back post.

With both wing backs pushed up so high, it’s common for seven or eight of Inter’s players to record the majority of their touches in the opposing half, which would be unusual for most other teams.

Crystal Palace wing back Daniel Muñoz plays in a similar way. He has 15 goal involvements since the beginning of the 2024-25 season and, as with Dumfries, he can be hard for defenses to pick up because he often receives the ball in the space between their defensive and midfield lines. Plus, his incredible speed and stamina means he can run up and down the touchline relentlessly.

Certain coaches, such as Antonio Conte and Simone Inzaghi, have recognized the inherent value of wing backs and utilize them when possible. But in order to unleash them, you have to play a back three, or you’ll be too exposed in defense.

play

1:39

Hutchison: Carrick has made a mockery of Amorim’s Man United

ESPN’s Don Hutchison believes Michael Carrick has made a “mockery” of Ruben Amorim’s Manchester United.

Center backs can push into midfield

Playing a back three doesn’t necessarily mean you’re adding too much defensive personnel to your XI, however.

Some managers design their systems to allow one of the center backs to step up and join the midfield while in possession. So long as that player is comfortable on the ball, they can create a numerical overload in the middle of the pitch (while there are still two center backs covering behind them.)

Amorim has long been a proponent of this strategy. At Sporting CP, he asked Gonçalo Inacio to do this; while at Manchester United, he asked Lisandro Martínez, and later Luke Shaw, to carry out the role.

The pass map above shows the strongest cluster of passes coming from what is effectively a left center midfield — or even left No. 10 — space on the pitch. Much of the Red Devils’ passing volume went through Shaw (or Martínez) under Amorim, who pushed up and played very close to Bruno Fernandes and company.

Atalanta’s Giorgio Scalvini has also carried out this role from right center back in the past, Borussia Dortmund’s Nico Schlotterbeck also regularly dribbles into midfield from left center back, while Conte’s Premier League title-winning 2016-17 side at Chelsea encouraged Brazil defender David Luiz to roam forward and affect play however he felt best.

However, the best example of a center back pushing into midfield and completely changing a team’s dynamic is John Stones‘ role for Manchester City’s treble-winning side in 2022-23.

Just over halfway through that campaign, Pep Guardiola discovered a tactical tweak that no team had an answer for. He fielded four center backs (Stones, Rúben Dias, Manuel Akanji and Nathan Aké) in the defensive line, then asked Stones to join Rodri in midfield when the team were on the ball. That in turn pushed Ilkay Gündogan up next to Kevin De Bruyne, creating a 3-2-5 shape.

Stones’ role was to recycle the ball high up, as a midfielder would, but also form a barrier with Rodri to protect against counter attacks. That allowed Guardiola to use five players to attack, spread across the width of the pitch. A simple glance at his pass map (above) against Real Madrid in that year’s Champions League semifinal might fool you into thinking he purely played as a center midfielder … but he didn’t.

play

2:25

Marcotti ‘really disappointed’ in Guardiola’s tactics vs. Real Madrid

Gab & Juls react to Man City’s 3-0 loss to Real Madrid in the first leg of their round of 16 Champions League clash.

Center backs can join the attack

Some center backs even go beyond the central midfield areas and try to affect play in the final third more directly.

When Tottenham’s Cristian Romero played in Serie A for Genoa and Atalanta, he regularly steamed forward and joined the attack. Occasionally he’d appear next to the striker after a 40-yard dash, sensing the chance to arrive undetected and cause chaos.

These days, you might see Juventus’ Federico Gatti hammering up the pitch in a similar vein — although not always from a back three, which adds extra risk to the move — and then there’s Inter center back Alessandro Bastoni, who is a solid defender and a great long passer from the back, but also has license to push well beyond the midfield. In fact, the 26-year-old will regularly overlap his wing back (Dimarco), receive the ball and cross, or he’ll make an underlapping run and get into the opposition box himself.

Bastoni has had an astonishing 477 touches in the attacking third this season, the 19th-most in Serie A; he heavily contributes to the league’s best attack, yet also remains integral to a defense that have conceded just 23 goals in 29 games.

But if you think that’s impressive then get ready, because NEC. Nijmegen take it to the extreme.

NEC have a remarkable story. A storied, small club from the Netherlands who have never won a major trophy, they currently sit third in the Eredivisie, above the giants of Ajax and other regular European qualifiers such as AZ Alkmaar and FC Twente.

And they’ve risen to this point by playing the most reckless football you will ever see this season. NEC build out from the back and attack in freeform fashion, with center backs steaming up the pitch to join the forward line, wingers ending up at the back and everything in between. Elazar Dasa, the right center back, has sent in 34 crosses this season, which is more than some teams’ forwards around Europe.

NEC’s base formation is a 3-4-2-1, but as soon as one player makes a pass, they move up the pitch and the shape melts. It is perhaps the ultimate example of why playing with three center backs doesn’t necessarily mean you’re playing defensively. After all, only champions-elect PSV Eindhoven have scored more goals (77) than NEC’s 67, while they’ve only conceded the joint-seventh-most (45), which is impressive given they can leave themselves hugely open at the back on occasion.

Pushing the limits

In the same way that no 4-4-2 is the same — Sean Dyche’s relegation-battling variant for Burnley, which hoofs the ball to a target man, is night and day to Unai Emery’s possession-based, controlled version at Aston Villa — a back three system is not necessarily defensive.

The proof of that is in the pudding: Inter are Serie A’s top scorers with 65; Dortmund are the Bundesliga’s second-top scorers with 55; and Lens are Ligue 1’s third-top scorers with 49. All those teams play a back-three system consistently.

Conte has unleashed a back three to great attacking effect over the years with various clubs such as Chelsea, Juventus and Napoli; while Manuel Gasperini, the creator of some wonderful Atalanta teams that have thrilled in front of goal, is also back-three stalwart.

ESPN’s Ryan O’Hanlon recently argued that the world — and most specifically the Premier League — needs more back threes, as the flexibility and ingenuity the shape allows could be an effective antidote to a world of man-marking, physicality and set pieces.

Not every back-three story is a success, though … and that brings us back round to Amorim’s Manchester United.

His side missed plenty of the opportunities in front of goal, as the Portuguese struggled to get the best out of young striker Benjamin Sesko and stifled creative midfielder Bruno Fernandes in a deeper role that heavily restricted his impact in the final third. Meanwhile, United were defensively poor; only six clubs let in more goals than their 30, as the system was forced on a squad which lacked the athleticism in center midfield to pull it off. And now interim boss Michael Carrick has ditched it for a back four, results have improved.

But don’t let that put you off. As several clubs, from last season’s Champions League finalists Inter to Dutch upstarts NEC are showcasing, a back three can be system that pushes the limits of “attacking” when deployed properly. And isn’t that just what football needs?



Source link

Rescue crews recover bodies from Kabul hospital airstrike blamed on Pakistan

0


KABUL, Afghanistan — Rescue crews were still digging bodies out of the rubble of a drug rehabilitation hospital in the Afghan capital on Tuesday morning, after officials there said that an overnight Pakistani airstrike killed at least 400 people in a dramatic escalation of a conflict between the two neighbors that is now in its third week.

Pakistan has denied Afghanistan’s accusation that it targeted a hospital, insisting that its strikes, which were also conducted in eastern Afghanistan on Monday, were aimed at military facilities. It dismissed Afghanistan’s claims of hundreds of casualties from a strike on a hospital as being propaganda.

The casualties were taken to several hospitals in the area. It wasn’t immediately possible to independently confirm the death toll.

The conflict between Afghanistan and Pakistan began in late February, and has seen repeated cross-border clashes as well as airstrikes inside Afghanistan. International calls for a ceasefire have gone unheeded. The strike came hours after Afghan officials said that the two sides exchanged fire along their common border, killing four people in Afghanistan.

Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of providing safe haven for militants who frequently carry out attacks inside Pakistan, especially to the Pakistani Taliban, a group separate but closely allied with the Afghan Taliban who took over Afghanistan in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of U.S.-led troops. The group, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, or TTP, is designated as a terrorist organization by the United States. Kabul denies the charge.

In a late-night post on X, Afghanistan’s deputy government spokesperson Hamdullah Fitrat said the airstrike had hit the Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital, a 2,000-bed facility in Kabul, at about 9 p.m. local time.

He said that large sections of the facility had been destroyed, and that the death toll had “so far” reached 400 people, while about 250 people had been reported wounded. There was no updated official death toll early Tuesday morning.

Local television stations posted footage on X showing security forces using flashlights as they carried out casualties while firefighters struggled to extinguish flames among the ruins of a building.

The Omid hospital was renamed and expanded in size roughly a year ago from the Ibn Sina Drug Addiction Treatment Hospital. The site is located near a former NATO military base, Camp Phoenix, where U.S. forces used to train the Afghan National Army. After the Taliban seized control of the country in 2021, the base was taken over by Afghanistan’s new authorities. It wasn’t immediately clear what was now housed on the site of the former base.

Pakistan’s Information Ministry said in an X post that the Pakistani military had “precisely targeted” the Camp Phoenix site, which it said was now a “military terrorist ammunition and equipment storage site.” It said in its post that Omid hospital was “multiple kilometers” away from the former camp and accused Afghan officials of lying.

“Another important question also lingers, as to why would an alleged drug rehabilitation facility be colocated with lethal ammunition storage site in a military camp? This also remains unanswered,” the Information Ministry wrote.

Afghan government spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid condemned the strike on X, accusing Pakistan of “targeting hospitals and civilian sites to perpetrate horrors.” He said those killed were “innocent civilians and addicts.”

“We strongly condemn this crime and consider such an act to be against all accepted principles and a crime against humanity,” he said in a separate post on X.

A member of the rescue team working at the site on Tuesday morning, Allah Mohammad Farooq, said that hundreds had been killed.

“When we arrived here, everyone was buried under the rubble,” he said. “We then used a crane to pull them out. Most of the people were dead, and many are still trapped under the debris. “

A man sitting outside the site broke down in tears as he recounted hearing about the bombing. Haji Najibullah said that his son and other relatives were being treated in the hospital.

“We have no information about who is alive and who is buried under the rubble,” he said. “Only God knows who may have survived and who may be injured. So far, we have no news at all.”

The U.N. human rights expert in Afghanistan, Richard Bennet, said in an X post that he was “dismayed by fresh reports of #Pakistan airstrikes in #Afghanistan and resulting civilian casualties.” Offering his condolences, he added: “I urge parties to de-escalate, exercise maximum restraint & respect international law, including the protection of civilians and civilian objects such as hospitals.”

Shortly after Afghanistan accused Pakistan of targeting the hospital Monday night, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s spokesperson, Mosharraf Zaidi, dismissed the allegations as baseless, saying no hospital was targeted in Kabul.

Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar posted on X in the early hours of Tuesday that the Pakistani military had “carried out precision airstrikes” targeting military installations in Kabul and the eastern province of Nangarhar. He said that “technical support infrastructure and ammunition storage facilities” at two locations in Kabul were destroyed.

“All targeting has been done with precision only at those infrastructures which are being used by Afghan Taliban regime to support its multiple terror proxies,” he wrote.

The fighting — the most severe between the two neighbors — began in late February after Afghanistan launched cross-border attacks in response to Pakistani airstrikes inside Afghanistan that Kabul said killed civilians. The clashes disrupted a ceasefire brokered by Qatar in October, after earlier fighting killed dozens of soldiers, civilians and suspected militants.

Pakistan has declared that it’s in “open war” with Afghanistan. The conflict has alarmed the international community, particularly as the area is one where other militant organizations, including al-Qaida and the Islamic State group, still have a presence and have been trying to resurface.

On Saturday, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari said that Afghanistan’s Taliban administration crossed a “red line” by deploying drones that wounded several civilians in Pakistan last week.

___

Munir Ahmed reported from Islamabad, and Elena Becatoros from Athens, Greece.



Source link